Dustin Kinamore v. His Majesty the King

Are the complainant's prior text messages relevant to determining whether she consented to sexual activity?

Was an application under s. 276 of the Criminal Code required to determine the admissibility of prior sexual communications introduced by the defense?

If the prior text messages between the accused and complainant were of a sexual nature, was a voir dire necessary?

Did the voir dire determine the admissibility of evidence of prior sexual communications led by Crown counsel?